Teamscore für Team Georg Madany (1)

Team Georg Madany200Team Dr. Petra von Cube
110:24
Georg MadanyHendrik Nanninga57:11Dr. Petra von CubeVera Fröhlich
Dagmar LeiboldUta von SeckendorffChristian Tobias BolikRobert Jaßniger
Board 16,0S 4 =A+42011S 4 -2A−1006,0
Board 21,0W 4 -3A+1502W 4 -2A+1001,0
Board 32,0W 2 -26+2003O 3 -19+1002,0
Board 41,0S 3SA +25+6602S 3SA =6+6001,0
Board 59,0N 3SA =8+60013N 2SA -22−2009,0
Board 60,0N 3 +16+1301N 3 +23+1500,0
Board 71,0W 3SA +15−6301W 3SA +29−6600,0
Board 84,0N 3SA +12+4307S 1SA +12+1204,0
Board 94,0N 3 +18+1707S 2 X -1D−1004,0
Board 100,0N 4 +1A+650N 3SA +2A+6600,0
Board 111,0W 3SA =D−4001W 3SA +1D−4300,0
Board 12−6,0W 3SA =D−40010W 3SA -1D+50−6,0
Board 130,0N 3 =5+140N 3 =9+1400,0
Board 140,0N 2SA +2B+1801S 2SA +14+1501,0
Board 155,0W 5 X -5A+11009S 4 +26+6805,0
Board 160,0W 1 +18−110O 2SA =10−1200,0
Georg MadanyHendrik Nanninga53:13Dagmar LeiboldUta von Seckendorff
Dr. Petra von CubeVera FröhlichChristian Tobias BolikRobert Jaßniger
Board 171,0O 2 =B−1101S 2SA -32−1501,0
Board 180,0S 4 X -19−200S 4 X -14−2000,0
Board 195,0O 2 +36−2009O 4 =3−6205,0
Board 200,0S 3 =A+1401S 2 =A+1101,0
Board 211,0O 3SA +38−4901W 3SA +42−5200,0
Board 224,0N 4 =K+4207N 3 =K+1404,0
Board 236,0N 4 +1A+65011N 2 +1D+1406,0
Board 240,0W 4 -1A+50O 3 -1K+500,0
Board 25−1,0S 2 -28−1002S 2 -15−50−1,0
Board 26−4,0O 2 =A−1106N 3 =B+140−3,0
Board 271,0S 2 -17−502S 3 -22−1001,0
Board 284,0S 4 -110−1007S 5 -42−4004,0
Board 290,0S 4 +1B+650N 3SA +23+6600,0
Board 300,0O 2SA =K−1201N 3 -2B−1000,0
Board 31−2,0N 1SA -13−1004W 1 -1D+50−2,0
Board 3210,0W 2SA =6−12014S 1SA X -54−110010,0
Ergebnis: 1. Rang mit 20,00 SP / 86,0 Imps

Teamscore für Team Dr. Petra von Cube (2)

Team Dr. Petra von Cube020Team Georg Madany
24:110
Dr. Petra von CubeVera Fröhlich11:57Georg MadanyHendrik Nanninga
Christian Tobias BolikRobert JaßnigerDagmar LeiboldUta von Seckendorff
Board 1−6,0S 4 -2A−10011S 4 =A+420−6,0
Board 2−1,0W 4 -2A+1002W 4 -3A+150−1,0
Board 3−2,0O 3 -19+1003W 2 -26+200−2,0
Board 4−1,0S 3SA =6+6002S 3SA +25+660−1,0
Board 5−9,0N 2SA -22−20013N 3SA =8+600−9,0
Board 60,0N 3 +23+1501N 3 +16+1300,0
Board 70,0W 3SA +29−6601W 3SA +15−630−1,0
Board 8−4,0S 1SA +12+1207N 3SA +12+430−4,0
Board 9−4,0S 2 X -1D−1007N 3 +18+170−4,0
Board 100,0N 3SA +2A+660N 4 +1A+6500,0
Board 110,0W 3SA +1D−4301W 3SA =D−400−1,0
Board 126,0W 3SA -1D+5010W 3SA =D−4006,0
Board 130,0N 3 =9+140N 3 =5+1400,0
Board 14−1,0S 2SA +14+1501N 2SA +2B+1800,0
Board 15−5,0S 4 +26+6809W 5 X -5A+1100−5,0
Board 160,0O 2SA =10−120W 1 +18−1100,0
Dagmar LeiboldUta von Seckendorff13:53Georg MadanyHendrik Nanninga
Christian Tobias BolikRobert JaßnigerDr. Petra von CubeVera Fröhlich
Board 17−1,0S 2SA -32−1501O 2 =B−110−1,0
Board 180,0S 4 X -14−200S 4 X -19−2000,0
Board 19−5,0O 4 =3−6209O 2 +36−200−5,0
Board 20−1,0S 2 =A+1101S 3 =A+1400,0
Board 210,0W 3SA +42−5201O 3SA +38−490−1,0
Board 22−4,0N 3 =K+1407N 4 =K+420−4,0
Board 23−6,0N 2 +1D+14011N 4 +1A+650−6,0
Board 240,0O 3 -1K+50W 4 -1A+500,0
Board 251,0S 2 -15−502S 2 -28−1001,0
Board 263,0N 3 =B+1406O 2 =A−1104,0
Board 27−1,0S 3 -22−1002S 2 -17−50−1,0
Board 28−4,0S 5 -42−4007S 4 -110−100−4,0
Board 290,0N 3SA +23+660S 4 +1B+6500,0
Board 300,0N 3 -2B−1001O 2SA =K−1200,0
Board 312,0W 1 -1D+504N 1SA -13−1002,0
Board 32−10,0S 1SA X -54−110014W 2SA =6−120−10,0
Ergebnis: 2. Rang mit 0,00 SP / −86,0 Imps